Descripción
The study reveals that, although the swap made it possible to allocate resources for conservation and opened spaces for participation thanks to civil society’s advocacy before the MICI, its impact on Ecuador’s debt was marginal and came with strong financial and legal conditionalities. The operation transferred strategic decision-making to private trusts under foreign jurisdiction, reducing state and community control. Despite the gains achieved in terms of transparency and participation, the core aspects of the design remain unchanged, reproducing the asymmetries of the global financial system. The Galápagos case leaves key lessons for future processes: the need to ensure public debate, democratic control, and sovereignty over common goods before adopting debt-for-nature swap mechanisms.






